ok, i feel like i should maybe weigh in on this whole Rutgers dropping ‘library’ from SCILS situation. i posted a comment on my friend mike’s blog, and i guess if i’m gonna speak my mind there, i might as well post it here as well. since i am lazy and don’t really feel like spending much time or effort stressing over the whole thing, i’m just going to copy and paste my comment. (and what an easy way to drop a post in, since i haven’t written in awhile. heh.)
this whole debacle annoys me for two reasons:
1) isn’t this whole name change thing taking up time and money (meetings, new letterhead, signage, etc) that could be better spent on just improving the school in general, including the library curriculum? i mean, really, all this effort just to remove the word “library” from your name? …and
2) how did they think that going to all that trouble to remove library from the name was not going to insult all of us libeerians? it’s like they’re distancing themselves from one of their largest constituencies (largest if you’re talking about the grad school.) no matter what their reasoning is, that’s going to be hurtful, and going to alienate us.
what i really wish is that instead of trying to distance ourselves from the word “librarian”, we would redefine it as the tech-savvy, tech-centered, information-aggregating career it should and could be. we don’t need to turn ourselves into “information professionals”, we need to bring the field of librarianship into the future (and the now…) i know that’s a bit off-topic, but i feel like we don’t need to scrap the title, it’s not completely a lost cause, we can still redeem ourselves! (maybe all we need is a good PR campaign?)